Archives of Personal Papers ex libris Ludwig Benner, Jr.
   - - - - - -Last updated on Sunday, November 21, 2004
[Return to Home Page ]    [ Investigation Research Roundtable ]   [ Contact Host via lbjr05 at cox.net ]

Click here to order reproduction permissions for public use ( Item R070) for this Paper

 

Proceedings of the 15 th International System Safety Conference
Washington, DC August 13-17, 1997
page 393
© 1997 Ludwig Benner, Jr .

SYSTEM SAFETY ANALYSIS PITFALLS

by Ludwig Benner, Jr., PE; Ludwig Benner & Associates; Oakton, VA

CONTENTS
    Abstract
    Introduction
    System Definition Requirements
    Update of current system safety guidance search
    Discussion of results.
    Implications of Findings.
    Conclusions
    References
    Biography

Abstract

Unacknowledged deficiencies in system safety techniques create pitfalls for system safety analysts. The deficiencies are the absence of (1) generally accepted specifications for defining a system for system safety analysis purposes, (2) a generally accepted method for defining systems, and task requirement to apply the specifications or method, and (3) a system safety analysis feedback method and requirement that would disclose these deficiencies.

System safety analysts typically use system or subsystem descriptions supplied by others. Published system safety hazard discovery techniques provide no specifications for what constitutes an acceptable system definition. This deficiency creates unsuspected problems for system safety analysts. Consequences include inadequately understood system interactions, and undiscovered or overlooked hazards that lead to unnecessary mishaps. Remedial action is suggested.

Appendix 1. Requirements for System Definition Hazard Analysis Techniques

Click heree Click here to order a reprint of this paper ( Item R071) for this Paper